Categories
2023 HOT News-EN

HACKS OF THE DAY 01/01/2023

news

HACKS OF THE DAY 01/01/2023

Discover the cyber attacks in the world with Hacks Of The Day!

Today’s HOTD includes 2 ransomware victims of the notorious LockBit 3.0 and Play Ransomware gangs.

The average Cyber Risk Factor of the day is  3.5.

Read below the full list.

Disclaimer: 

Data are collected from public info published on the Dark Web.
The Cyber Risk Factor is calculated on cyber attacks’ impact based on available data.

It shows the severity of the event: 1 = low, 5 = critical

EDS AUTOMOTIVE GMBH

Victim website:

eds-automotive.de

Victim country:

Germany

Attacker name:

LockBit 3.0

Attacker class:

Cybercrime

Attack technique:

Ransomware

Ransom demand:

$ 100000

Exfiltrated data amount:

N/A

Exfiltrated data type:

Miscellaneous documents

Leaked data:

70% of the total amount exfiltrated

Ransom deadline:

01st Jan 23

Cyber Risk Factor:

4

CDER

Victim website:

cder.fr

Victim country:

France

Attacker name:

Play Ransomware

Attacker class:

Cybercrime

Attack technique:

Ransomware

Ransom demand:

N/A

Exfiltrated data amount:

5 GB

Exfiltrated data type:

Personal, private data, clients’ documents, agreements, passports, id etc.

Leaked data:

All exfiltrated data

Ransom deadline:

08th Jan 23

Cyber Risk Factor:

3

Stay safe!

Hackmanac Team

Latest news

HACKS OF TODAY 26/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 19 victims by the notorious Rhysida, Everest, RansomHouse, DarkVault, RansomHub, Medusa, Hunters International, Cactus  and dAn0n gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.2. Read...

Read More

HACKS OF TODAY 25/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 8 ransomware victims by the notorious RansomHub, Hunters International, Black Suit, Qiulong, DarkVault, RansomHouse, Qilin and MyData gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.0....

Read More

HACKS OF TODAY 24/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 10 ransomware victims by the notorious RansomHouse, Black Suit, Rhysida, BianLian, RansomHub, BlackBasta, Eraleig and Qiulong gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.4. Read...

Read More
Categories
2022 News-EN

CYBER ATTACKS ANALYSIS: WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT WORKS

news

CYBER ATTACKS ANALYSIS: WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT WORKS

When we started this research in 2011, our aim was to raise awareness and improve understanding of cyber threats.

At the time, “cyber” risks were not even considered in the World Economic Forum’s Global Risk Report, in which they were only introduced in 2015, and communicating the urgency of dealing with IT security was complex in the absence of quantitative data able to illustrate the problem and its evolution over time.

If 11 years ago, however, the situation could have seemed worrying to us, at this point it is no longer a mystery that we are in full emergency and that no one can consider themselves safe from cyber attacks.

So let’s see how our classification of cyber attacks works.

CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA

In over 10 years, the analysis and classification of cyber attacks has greatly evolved.

The methodology used has been refined and updated over time, both from the point of view of the number and quality of the sources, and the quantity of variables to describe the different phenomena and the taxonomies used to classify the data, completely revised to comply with what as much as possible to internationally recognized standards.

THE VICTIMS
The classification system of the product sectors adopted to map the victims of cyber attacks is derived from the ISIC (International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities) of the United Nations and from the NACE (Nomenclature statistique des activités économiques dans la Communauté Européenne) of the European Commission. , from which also the Italian ATECO Codes derive.

Our classification of victims has obviously been adapted to also include the types of cyber attack targets excluded by the previous standards and includes a total of 20 product categories and 141 sub-categories.

THE ATTACK TECHNIQUES
The classification of attack techniques is derived from the MITRE ATT&CK®, the Threat Taxonomy of ENISA (European Union Agency for Cybersecurity), the Open Threat Taxonomy and several other frameworks.

It includes 8 macro-categories and 59 sub-categories.

THE ATTACKERS
The classification of the attackers derives from our experience in the field and represents a mapping between the main families of “bad actors” and the reasons for the attacks observed in over 10 years of investigations.

It includes 4 macro-categories and 13 sub-categories.

THE SEVERITY
Since 2017 we have introduced an index of the severity of the analyzed attacks, classifying them on the basis of increasing levels, which allows us to carry out an analysis of the different impacts caused by the various IT incidents and to offer interesting information to both companies and institutions.

SAMPLE CONSIDERATIONS

In 11 years, we have identified, classified and evaluated over 14,000 cyber attacks (on average more than 100 per month).

Of these, 7,144 occurred in the last 4 years, from 2018 to 2021 (of which 2,049 in the last year alone), demonstrating an impressive acceleration in the frequency and severity of cyber threats.

The sample includes successful cyber attacks that have become public.

This allows us to photograph the situation of the threats that have managed to overcome the defenses in the field and that have also had reputational repercussions, in addition to further economic, technological and often even legal damage.

On the other hand, our sample is necessarily partial in that some attacks never become public domain, or the victims manage not to advertise them (unless forced by circumstances or by regulatory obligations), or due to their nature they emerge more difficult (this is the case of cyber espionage and information warfare activities, certainly underrepresented compared to cybercrime and hacktivism).

It is therefore plausible to assume that the scenario depicted by the analysis of cyber attacks is even less critical than the situation on the ground.

Another reason to continue to evolve this analysis and use this data strategically.

Contact us for more details and see a sample of our data on our Dashboard!

Latest news

HACKS OF TODAY 26/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 19 victims by the notorious Rhysida, Everest, RansomHouse, DarkVault, RansomHub, Medusa, Hunters International, Cactus  and dAn0n gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.2. Read...

Read More

HACKS OF TODAY 25/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 8 ransomware victims by the notorious RansomHub, Hunters International, Black Suit, Qiulong, DarkVault, RansomHouse, Qilin and MyData gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.0....

Read More

HACKS OF TODAY 24/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 10 ransomware victims by the notorious RansomHouse, Black Suit, Rhysida, BianLian, RansomHub, BlackBasta, Eraleig and Qiulong gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.4. Read...

Read More
Categories
2022 News-EN

ARE INSTANT MESSAGING APPS SAFE?

news

ARE INSTANT MESSAGING APPS SAFE?

Instant messaging applications are becoming more and more popular.

And not only for personal messages: since now smart working became a common alternative, the trend is to use instant messaging apps to exchange information business related too, as an alternative to emails and phone calls.

But are these apps really safe?

All major instant messaging applications now use of the end-to-end (E2E) encryption mechanism.

With this system, messages are encrypted with a pair of keys, one public and one private, which are exchanged only between sender and recipient.

The advantage is that in this way the messages cannot be read if intercepted by a third party (a type of attack that is called “Man in the middle” or MITM).

But, while the public key is attached to the first message sent, the private key is instead tied to the device where the app is installed, making it the weak point of the system.

If the device is stolen or hacked in any way, someone else will be able to access and read the messages.

Data encryption, therefore, although very important, has limitations.

And it is not the only parameter to be evaluated to protect yourself from privacy risks.

Another aspect to take into consideration is the Metadata management. Metadata are all the data that can be collected on the user’s account and his activities and that can be considered the electronic fingerprint.

In the case of instant messaging apps, metadata collected may include the sender and recipient phone numbers, the contact list, the duration and time of the conversation, the used device, the IP address, etc …

Through the metadata, even if it is not possible to read the content of the messages, it is in any case possible to deduce useful information and profile the user and his interlocutors.

However, each app can have a different policy for managing metadata, and this is certainly a good starting point for getting useful tips on how to identify the safest apps.

Among the various instant messaging applications, WhatsApp is undoubtedly the most popular in the world.

But is it really safe?

The app has been using an extremely secure E2E encryption protocol since 2016 (the same as Signal, see below).

Furthermore, this system is active by default, without giving the user the possibility to deactivate it: an advantage from the point of view of managing privacy risks.

However, Whatsapp keeps user metadata on its servers.

Since Whatsapp is owned by Facebook, the chances for users of being profiled by both applications increase dramatically.

Ultimately, Whatsapp certainly does not prove to be the most privacy-friendly messaging app ever.

So, what are the alternatives?

Here are 3:

  1. Telegram

    Telegram is the best known alternative to Whatsapp and is often considered a safer application.

    It is certainly a feature-rich app, suitable for various uses and which also overcomes some limitations of Whatsapp, such as the number of participants in a group chat.

    But, from the point of privacy risks, things are more complex.

    Telegram is in fact an entirely cloud-based messaging app: chats and message history are saved on their servers.

    This feature, which on the one hand allows users to manage conversations from different devices, however, exposes to numerous risks as it’s easier for criminals to access data.

    As for encryption, the app offers only client-server encryption by default, i.e. from sender to server and from server to recipient.

    E2E encryption is only available in secret chats, but this option is not default and must be activated in advance.

    Therefore, if you think Telegram is a safer messaging application than Whatsapp you must change your mind and take all aspects into consideration.


  2. Signal

    Signal is a still little-known open-source instant messaging app, but it has interesting features.

    Recommended by several Cyber Security experts and even by the European Commission, Signal uses an E2E encryption protocol called “Signal Encryption Protocol“, considered among the best and subsequently adopted by Whatsapp and other instant messaging apps.

    While it needs a phone number to work, Signal has taken a respectful approach to the privacy of its users right from the start.

    In addition to the common characteristics of the messaging applications, Signal allows you to send messages that can be self-destructed and even to manage encrypted audio messages.

    Furthermore, it only stores the metadata necessary for its operation, such as phone number and profile information, not storing other metadata on their servers.

    It may not be the best known app in the world, but its uncompromising approach certainly makes Signal one of the most secure applications.


  3. Threema

    Threema is another open-source app, developed and maintained in Switzerland, and therefore subject to local data protection laws.

    Unlike previous applications, Threema is not free and is still almost unknown.

    However, it has the advantage of assigning a unique key to the user (Threema ID), so that it can be used in a totally anonymous way, without any obligation to enter a telephone number, an email or further information about the user.

    The most interesting aspect is that everything is encrypted with E2E encryption, from messages, to calls, to exchanged files.

    In addition, data, such as contact lists or group chats, are stored in a decentralized way on users’ devices, rather than on a Threema server.

    And the messages are deleted from the server after transmission.

    This ensures maximum privacy for users.

    Although it is definitely the least known application among the previous ones, as well as a not-free one, Threema by far guarantees the greatest degree of confidentiality.
In conclusion, it is important to distinguish the use we must make of instant messaging apps in order to evaluate the most correct application for our purposes.

If WhatsApp is indeed good for personal communications, with the advantage of being a widely used app, it is important to discourage its use in a professional setting and in all cases where sensitive or confidential data is processed.

Unfortunately, many cyber attacks have shown how dangerous it can be to manage sensitive information through these communication tools and it is essential to be aware of these threats in order not to expose yourself to unnecessary risks.

Good job!

Latest news

HACKS OF TODAY 26/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 19 victims by the notorious Rhysida, Everest, RansomHouse, DarkVault, RansomHub, Medusa, Hunters International, Cactus  and dAn0n gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.2. Read...

Read More

HACKS OF TODAY 25/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 8 ransomware victims by the notorious RansomHub, Hunters International, Black Suit, Qiulong, DarkVault, RansomHouse, Qilin and MyData gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.0....

Read More

HACKS OF TODAY 24/04/2024

Today's HOT includes 10 ransomware victims by the notorious RansomHouse, Black Suit, Rhysida, BianLian, RansomHub, BlackBasta, Eraleig and Qiulong gangs. The average Cyber Risk Factor is  4.4. Read...

Read More
				
					-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xsFNBFyONI0BEAC3wJRo5qhtr1KsqVdMz7b5JqHmt7H0ZZr14oJ9TV/hD9LMfrKpnQ94dFGnpfGa BKC1wSoJN4Yfs5lg5YmN4hmHmm6PkjgQdenVgL4YDfLDodwn5DgXKuywRBqIFbbnTDvFAb03DX2A FPnc+4g2QHsfiFycz+ISg/Z+8i21gY3j5oZlrdMKVWrNczrNc/lDJqJ36RSYDn1QzAW1ZGY/pUXk imPRvLew5Idr3462sZVVhuUFMD3Uf/W1SaS3bSEQM89pSYKZfo8AFpAs659Mn7gqKru6ndxilRdF wJGQuepqR8kz+vVPLyxJj68ii2ZBIY50RQvSBgJRnNF/Htp30cuk3v8jfSGZit9XYTTGQThVbfGR ZcKWze/iF+es110+mNXA/8s7jKs95PI+z1Foc9o74Ujs8dvjEGHTaESIEzX3JtEZUCZUiPt/P8pU Jw0ewbj1XCacYxYVsR7ODlf6GEsjt868WcjiqsuuZo2rzO4og9hFU5DlBzuePklfhw8dO5CiMN2H vtSkAn4DkgHqC+JiciHc9h5Cvvfjp52oQPj1eYmU3LkOvGFmPXVIts3VfxsQT3gk+DmrQ4J//fAl tNRSbMBnGu5F/qnLLkJmKRKPKNNcpjptFznKxLZbxW5QbAeDok3ho8YQACfADKcrmaIRkoPr8/mn PxZgMSMB87W7sQARAQABzSRTb2ZpYSBTY296emFyaSA8c29maWFAaGFja21hbmFjLmNvbT7CwZQE EwEIAD4WIQTNwEbcXbH0vegGlHCd6fr0nsTifwUCXI40jQIbIwUJEswDAAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCd6fr0nsTifwKuD/4+3MaN+9eFiltI06fFBjr1Csh0OLFw89jFnpuYl9Sm ImVqmBwrnm+APxxLK4M+FMuNm4fW08X249t09Nsf0ba6UJ0HR/7/fRTipjzRLqHSr0+ZjVUGHhon fuuFZgNzPA5RmQZZCyiwyqZJs7pLn1QI/CtlDP6MsQhadywbkO/5LlDoBoYh/2DYNA/mtEfJbvc/ cOvfk47thj5OzcXJEWFxz7h2P5C2ELwxdhNPC+uqcOQkTScnuIBJooheJPhdmqOtOwrbUUIfaryM IESrol3Jg3/MUOe7FLXhwCSQGY1iefzl4py2jTeK936GMBHifLSUCA88lpE7ALkbf3+qJ9ABra9G e9e0dirIlPvFgBkEBBXsoIReQLrhHKFBtvKdrrE9Rb7kAwon+sW+3Uf6Ie3M8nTisGy2AmlI/tQ5 V0MHU2UJUNcc59hk7ADIlXN64eeqELgsMtlR4wEHd6nwcEpoPCTWfrVSwzsPtXUGNAGbgGxISv/F ltcFJ6Qw6Zy4f+YBEyCx/7GA3kjLllkcHv4kwHpP+WQCzbjh2JdkGEp5AY7puil1AtOFcbirbHbR 83KVeqx4Vvlyh2jhIDQYB/9qpTDC1xDKpndn40gnNd5hvjK0I0Xvbhb0PLhCpJQ5tsvPiQHjhOMF Wye3ZigaX1gTZxE29MLtwBbOYdGCYG0MrM7BTQRcjjSNARAAupAKTZXLRktriUVqhkZpU8zUVwrW ik6siStg7BppSJuKVW+Ic8QIagW0I48d2jZIIXrQRvqVBixn8eeBTE8Cujum1mZyhTw2sri3gE9i 81gisF17T/uewzRyYwx8obMfSEBnwJa44td7VjtbfLMRtfneK9R40+kELhhvXZa3DBbcG86zHVPU f1YkLX4RNSyjz4vOCX3WlcIAOr6MJA8DT+F5mUCVEhnkeUbflXtxRSeTUTfOw/3MYLs+mc6hWwLq gqTMcIQhDrYEY5wUgb5Mj86NR/uvsThL6MtWCJWVbfxHxM575woyTdD9E6HGO6loHYdky/7I+XFZ twgxsGn6HJYT+Gwn9BI5/DiwT1Qb/AyADktN1jGmZGTlniS+hly7rm0EHb2CTTM5zT1fh/sCOtQb nYIUf2in2cIfcFvzeFrUbDk2HfJMp5FmY6tBEV5xyNCww/mBkW2nuZy9CvAheJEOGoO8lyonPU2u ARq345LdbS6l+VdivPmZoLNpIMRw9MSTYmzm08h7C+/6hxzpjw1/nWZ+W2k9VpLutEs7KMtsbZR4 WhVFVS1uhqxrnjoeBHznh360Ou8SR+PFO0HIrYz4W7ayfcBhqcsGrM9u1E892gjUVTbPv8UoXQ8S Zm9ra2jqbfZGbyOpMIlyMzHTak7r0IZvCedEUDCimitbw98AEQEAAcLBfAQYAQgAJhYhBM3ARtxd sfS96AaUcJ3p+vSexOJ/BQJcjjSNAhsMBQkSzAMAAAoJEJ3p+vSexOJ/C+wP/iGvKG1NldCT2gR7 oWhmvgBnsD7qjC57RX0Go7WD1lmrWP4xWpvM6Tj0V4ZsXnyB8zUR38p49PPymjwy51FAss5PYh8S bVC1/sKC5Sae3kiAoMGH29MBAwL1IkJ8PNw6uOJHhUIJgKT5RWk2f7q3+Tha19slXwD/FC1IcBJK baxyVkG3cG5AnNvvKZyFAUNZ9FiBycaNHO4o6bCcCzSsaRLL2azudJLrF8UYPfTNBQ6Cr4QLqaRb t+ZqL2nqmcadO1AtxLtq5lQjxbhJ3jSYIcQJRq0ztbIBcPrdR2B/dfVED9cU5leSmNXxrh09gJ7N tmUpVo5fBcbf6fP7h2HIFBpH+G/8UUlcbm9pQ5Jcb8FEom0JrfaIAuv1gEIJAk1mkqLNzWUs8KuL nCBBVT2+2hfEZjtjUYbCLVB4LRCsLs9CY1wS3yKca90S8m0tfKcSj3K3k8qlKodkE2raX2GW2dm9 b200ENbb41B1uZlPts4Yh/AMfLqoNv8wyw0GlUQ2DqgDqviLANYbg4/GHwTLwO2b9UMHuTVU3woS 1LRKt0iPPsd+ir+9YRAVt5LB5XTS5C5cdIW9JSXQ+0cnbr3LPZCBulOew/M72liBINKWKGoUyueF 73ckNO9S7pzTOCpjn3+gAuzN/itwgwrMLoqUqqBuxzd7cKNJHTFdTIfTm53f =KIMs -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----